Is Karl Marx, Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer Relevant to Contemporary Society?

Classical sociological theories are theories of tremendous scale and are formulated in Europe between the mid-1800s and the mid-1900s or have their family in the patterns of that period. The effort of such established sociological scholars as Auguste Comte, Karl Marx and Herbert Spencer was basic in its time and played a major character in the progressive development of sociology. Moreover, the thoughts of these scholars draw out to be significant to sociological theory today, as they are consulted by contemporary sociologists. They have progressed toward becoming works of art since they have a broad exhibit of importance and manage midway huge social issues.

Auguste Comte and Contemporary SocietyAuguste Comte contributed incredibly to the progress of classical sociological thought. Comte in his positivistic work has argued that the validity of knowledge is gained only through the scientific approach of study which is based on experimentation, observation and comparison. So, in this occasion, he made an immense commitment to the advancement of traditional sociology as he linked sociology to the science. For example, the strategies for approaching research suggested are data collection, methodology and theorizing. In this manner, in contemporary sociology positivistic methodology is being utilized in research especially in quantitative research method, thus one will undoubtedly offer credit to Comte's commitment to the improvement of traditional sociological progress.

Karl Marx and contemporary societyKarl Marx famous work “Social Class and Conflict” wrote in response to the social dislocation and poverty that was on peak in Europe due to the merging industrialization. He opined that capitalism was the main reason of alienation of the common masses. The main focus of his work was on inequality under capitalism. He also expressed his views that social change is the only tool to erase the nature of capitalism. He elaborated that it is against the very nature of humans to work under the capitalist system. Humans are capable of doing many distinct things but if they would work under the umbrella of labor they would never be able to identify their potential.

Herbert Spenser and contemporary societySpencer contended that people were the basic source of moral law in a given society. But then evil and good were decided by the Divine force, which changed the nature of moral law. Evil itself, as indicated by Spencer, was a consequence of nonadaptation to outer conditions, and that in a clearly developed society it would vanish. Spencer's political views can be best portrayed as libertarian—he saw a constrained job for state mediation in ordinary issues, particularly monetary exercises. Spencer likewise contradicted state-regulated philanthropy, training, and even fundamental administrations like waste expulsion. Following his regulation of the survival of the fittest, Spencer even contradicted private generosity. State and private philanthropy both kept up "undesirable" or unfit individuals from society, and this smothered present and future society from developing to utmost congruity.

ConclusionIn a nut shell, Marx, Spenser and Comte, as described by the team of cheap assignment writing services, has incredibly affected the contemporary established sociological belief. The article has laid out their different classical social thoughts which still exist today. Although flaws may be disseminated in their claims, that demonstrates the wide construction and remaking of established sociological idea, how it appeared, refining changed the ideal models in sociological research, for example, positivism and experimentation.